Year 1999 A.D.

Video clip shows a mid-1960s imagining of what technology would be like in the year 1999.

Claim:   Video clip shows a mid-1960s imagining of what
technology would be like in the year 1999.


Status:   True.

Example:   [Collected via e-mail, January 2007]




This is allegedly a clip of online shopping as envisioned from the 1960’s, called “Shopping in 1999 A.D.”.

The video shows online bill paying and PC desktops with flat screen monitors, including a multi-screen display.

Fake or real?





Origins:   Many visionaries who tried to forecast what daily life
would be like for future generations made the mistake of simply projecting existing technologies as being bigger, faster, and more powerful. They often failed to anticipate that future technologies might take very different forms, might be put to previously unconsidered uses, and might accompany (or even help bring about) significant social changes.

The video clip

shown above — an excerpt from a 1967 Philco-Ford production entitled “Year 1999 A.D.,”
starring a young Wink Martindale — did a
fairly good job of anticipating some ways (if not the specific forms) in which technology might be used in daily life more than three decades in the future. Concepts such as “fingertip shopping,” an “electronic correspondence machine,” and others envisioned in this video anticipate several innovations that became commonplace within a few years of 1999: e-commerce, webcams, online bill payment and tax filing, electronic funds transfers (EFT), home-based laser printers, and e-mail.

As noted, although the technological concepts expressed in the video may be familiar to us, the specific forms used to realize them are somewhat different than their common modern implementations:


  • The “fingertip shopping” the wife engages in imagines the shopper remotely controlling cameras placed in stores to scan merchandise rather than working with virtual representations of stores (i.e., web sites).
  • The “household monitor screen” isn’t so much a webcam as it is a simple closed-circuit video security system.
  • The bills and tax forms the husband works with are scanned images of paper forms rather than electronic forms.
  • The “electronic correspondence machine” (e-mail) depends on the user’s writing messages by hand with a pen and a stylus rather than typing them with a keyboard and monitor.

The concepts are nonetheless relatively well-expressed, even if they don’t quite match up with some of the finer points of modern technologies. However, the video exemplifies the common flaw of anticipating technological changes but not societal changes — the daily life it depicts is firmly rooted in the mid-20th century American model of women as stay-at-home child rearers and shoppers, and men as breadwinners and heads of household. Apparently women in 1999 still wouldn’t be deemed to be up to handling tasks such as banking, bill-paying, and tax preparation, even with the help of electronic devices.

Last updated:   5 December 2007

 

Snopes.com
Since 1994
A Word to Our Loyal Readers

Support Snopes and make a difference for readers everywhere.

Editorial
  • David Mikkelson
  • Doreen Marchionni
  • David Emery
  • Bond Huberman
  • Jordan Liles
  • Alex Kasprak
  • Dan Evon
  • Dan MacGuill
  • Bethania Palma
  • Liz Donaldson
Operations
  • Vinny Green
  • Ryan Miller
  • Chris Reilly
  • Chad Ort
  • Elyssa Young

Most Snopes assignments begin when readers ask us, “Is this true?” Those tips launch our fact-checkers on sprints across a vast range of political, scientific, legal, historical, and visual information. We investigate as thoroughly and quickly as possible and relay what we learn. Then another question arrives, and the race starts again.

We do this work every day at no cost to you, but it is far from free to produce, and we cannot afford to slow down. To ensure Snopes endures — and grows to serve more readers — we need a different kind of tip: We need your financial support.

Support Snopes so we continue to pursue the facts — for you and anyone searching for answers.

Team Snopes