Did President Donald Trump Allow the Violence Against Women Act to Expire?

The future of the Violence Against Women Act remains in jeopardy, but President Trump signed a nine-week extension of it, just before it was due to lapse.

  • Published 5 October 2018


On 30 September 2018, the administration of President Donald Trump allowed the Violence Against Women Act to expire.


Mostly False
About this rating

What's True

The Violence Against Women Act was due to expire on 30 September 2018 and will lapse if not renewed by Congress before 7 December 2018.

What's False

The Violence Against Women Act has not been allowed to expire through lack of presidential action: it was already due to expire in September 2018 unless renewed by Congress, and President Trump signed an appropriations bill which included a provision to extend the act through 7 December 2018.


In September 2018, with most political debate and news coverage focused on the controversial nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress faced the prospect of allowing a major piece of legislation to expire.

The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) was first proposed by then-Senator Joe Biden in 1993 and signed into law in 1994. It provided significant federal funding for services offered to survivors of domestic and sexual violence, created the Office on Violence Against Women within the Justice Department, enhanced the training of law enforcement officers in the area of sexual and domestic violence, and strengthened penalties for certain sexual crimes, most notably requiring perpetrators of sexual violence to pay restitution to their victims.

The act, which comprises several constitutive laws, has been reauthorized every few years since 1994 with adjustments and additions being made on each occasion, most notably in 2013 when — after an unusually long party-line battle in Congress — the protections and provisions in the VAWA were extended to same-sex couples.

The act had been scheduled to expire on 30 September 2018, prompting concerns that women, children, and men who are vulnerable to domestic and sexual violence would no longer be protected by the the funding, services and legal provisions associated with the VAWA.

On 1 October, the Democratic candidate for New York attorney general, Tish James claimed on Twitter that President Donald Trump’s administration had “let the Violence Against Women Act expire without saying a word”:

October is Domestic Violence Awareness month, and at midnight the Trump Admin let the Violence Against Women Act expire without saying a word. This law provides grants for law enforcement training, victim services & prevention efforts. We can’t forget this today—or in November.

James’ claim was retweeted thousands of times and prompted inquiries from our readers about its veracity.

In fact, the VAWA was not allowed to expire on 30 September 2018, either by the Trump administration or members of Congress. James acknowledged this fact herself in a follow-up tweet in which she wrote:

Republicans & the Trump Admin quietly passed a 2 month funding extension, shoehorned into a larger spending bill. That’s nothing more than kicking the can down the road. We need a real reauthorization that provides long-term protections AND expands the #VAWA.

On 26 September, five days before James’ tweet, the House of Representatives voted through House bill 6157, an appropriations bill which provided funding through the 2019 financial year for the Department of Defense and other government departments, as well as an eclectic mix of several smaller measures, including spending related to the VAWA. The relevant section of that bill read as follows: “Any program, authority, or provision, including any pilot program, authorized under the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 shall continue in effect through the date specified in section 105(3) of this Act [7 December 2018.]”

On 28 September, President Trump signed H.R. 6157 into law, thus extending the provisions of the VAWA until 7 December. He did not mention the VAWA in either of his public statements about the appropriations bill.

Although James was wrong to claim that the Trump administration had allowed the VAWA to expire, the provisions of the VAWA do remain in jeopardy, and Congress has only nine weeks to either negotiate a proper reauthorization of the act or allow it to lapse.

To that end, two U.S. Representatives have introduced proposals that would reauthorize the provisions of the VAWA. On 26 July, Democratic Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee from the 18th district of Texas (Houston) introduced H.R. 6545, which would reauthorize the VAWA until 2023 and add new measures, including increased spending for survivors of domestic and sexual violence, enhanced protections against stalking, and a ban on perpetrators of stalking from buying or possessing firearms.

On 13 September, Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik from the 21st district of New York introduced H.R. 6796, which would simply extend the existing provisions of the VAWA until 31 March 2019.

As of 5 October, both bills were before various House committees and subcommittees, but neither had yet been debated.

Since 1994
A Word to Our Loyal Readers

Support Snopes and make a difference for readers everywhere.

  • David Mikkelson
  • Doreen Marchionni
  • David Emery
  • Bond Huberman
  • Jordan Liles
  • Alex Kasprak
  • Dan Evon
  • Dan MacGuill
  • Bethania Palma
  • Liz Donaldson
  • Vinny Green
  • Ryan Miller
  • Chris Reilly
  • Chad Ort
  • Elyssa Young

Most Snopes assignments begin when readers ask us, “Is this true?” Those tips launch our fact-checkers on sprints across a vast range of political, scientific, legal, historical, and visual information. We investigate as thoroughly and quickly as possible and relay what we learn. Then another question arrives, and the race starts again.

We do this work every day at no cost to you, but it is far from free to produce, and we cannot afford to slow down. To ensure Snopes endures — and grows to serve more readers — we need a different kind of tip: We need your financial support.

Support Snopes so we continue to pursue the facts — for you and anyone searching for answers.

Team Snopes