Did the RNC Block Challengers to Trump’s Re-Election?

The Republican National Committee passed a resolution supporting President Trump at a winter 2019 gathering but didn't completely preclude an intra-party challenge.

  • Published 29 January 2019

Claim

The Republican National Committee has barred any intraparty challenges to President Donald Trump's bid for re-election.

Rating

What's True

The RNC unanimously passed a resolution supporting Donald Trump at their winter business meeting in January 2019.

What's False

The resolution did not override an RNC rule allowing for a candidate who wins majority support in at least five states to be placed into nomination for the presidency.

Origin

Although the Republican National Committee (RNC) has reportedly pledged its support to President Donald Trump, it is still technically possible for candidates within the GOP to run against the incumbent president as a primary challenger.

The RNC unanimously passed a resolution backing the president on 25 January 2019 during its annual winter business meeting in New Mexico. RNC Resolutions Committee Chair Carolyn McLarty, who sponsored the resolution, told the Washington Examiner she did so to provide support and encouragement to President Trump.

“As you know, there’s been so much belittling and that kind of thing going on, Washington elites attacking the president,” she said. “And that’s the focus of mine, to give him support, give him encouragement. I didn’t need to go beyond that.”

However, a measure explicitly calling for Trump to be re-nominated by the Republican Party as its presidential candidate going into 2020 failed to gain traction. According to RNC rules, a challenger could emerge if any candidate receives support from a majority of party delegates in at least five states. National committee member, Jevon O.A. Williams, reportedly pushed unsuccessfully for a rules change to cut off that potential “loophole.”

Former U.S. senator Jeff Flake of Arizona cited the show of support by the RNC for Trump as a reason to not issue his own challenge to the president, accusing the committee of trying to “squelch” any opposition to Trump’s re-election campaign.

The committee’s national press secretary, Cassie Smedile, told us:

All of the talk about a challenger is a little silly, there’s no interest among Republican voters for this and the American people as a whole will vote to continue the President’s mission to MAGA. The RNC has been working hand in hand with the campaign since before the convention in 2016 and we will continue to do so. We’re working with the campaign in ways that have never been done before to ensure we have the most robust and efficient election operation in history.

While the RNC has not barred primary challengers to stand against the president, party leadership in two states, Kansas and South Carolina, are considering suspending their presidential caucuses and primary, respectively, in anticipation that President Trump would seek re-election unopposed.

Snopes.com
Since 1994
A Word to Our Loyal Readers

Support Snopes and make a difference for readers everywhere.

Editorial
  • David Mikkelson
  • Doreen Marchionni
  • David Emery
  • Bond Huberman
  • Jordan Liles
  • Alex Kasprak
  • Dan Evon
  • Dan MacGuill
  • Bethania Palma
  • Liz Donaldson
Operations
  • Vinny Green
  • Ryan Miller
  • Chris Reilly
  • Chad Ort
  • Elyssa Young

Most Snopes assignments begin when readers ask us, “Is this true?” Those tips launch our fact-checkers on sprints across a vast range of political, scientific, legal, historical, and visual information. We investigate as thoroughly and quickly as possible and relay what we learn. Then another question arrives, and the race starts again.

We do this work every day at no cost to you, but it is far from free to produce, and we cannot afford to slow down. To ensure Snopes endures — and grows to serve more readers — we need a different kind of tip: We need your financial support.

Support Snopes so we continue to pursue the facts — for you and anyone searching for answers.

Team Snopes