Police Say Meth Has Been Contaminated with Ebola

A police department shared a humorous but fake message asking meth users to bring in their drugs to be checked for Ebola contamination.

  • Published 23 March 2016


Police are asking meth users to bring in their drugs because they might be contaminated with Ebola.

I read on Facebook just now that meth from St. Joseph area is contaminated with Ebola and should be turned into the police. It also mentioned Texas. Don't know if they mean St. Joseph Hospital in Houston, Texas or St. Joseph, Missouri? Is this true or not?

Collected via e-mail, March 2016


What's True

A police department posted a humorous message on Facebook warning meth users about potential Ebola contamination.

What's False

Methamphetamine supplies have been contaminated with Ebola.


In March 2016, several warnings circulated on Facebook stating that methamphetamine supplies, and the ingredients used to create meth for recreational drug use, could be contaminated with the virus for the deadly disease Ebola. While the most popular version of this Facebook message claimed that the Ebola contamination affected meth users in Hot Springs, Arkansas, other iterationsmentioned various locations that included cities in the states of CaliforniaOklahoma, Texas, Washington and Kentucky:

hot springs meth

Regardless of the locations mentioned in these warnings, they all featured nearly verbatim language and a generic “Breaking News Alert” graphic — the hallmark of fake news hoaxes. While police departments may appreciate drug users’ voluntarily turning their meth in due to fears of Ebola contamination, these messages are an obvious jape.

The exact origins of the joke warnings are unclear, but we did find at least one police department Facebook page that reproduced one of them. On 23 March 2016, the Grayson Police Department posted on Facebook that their warning had been “tongue in cheek” and that the ruse resulted in no arrests:

Well, apparently everyone is confident in the quality of their methamphetamine, as we had no one bring theirs in to be checked. While our post yesterday was “tongue in cheek”, the dangers of meth use are no laughing matter. As always, we encourage anyone with suspicions of illegal drug activity to give us a call!

Since 1994
A Word to Our Loyal Readers

Support Snopes and make a difference for readers everywhere.

  • David Mikkelson
  • Doreen Marchionni
  • David Emery
  • Bond Huberman
  • Jordan Liles
  • Alex Kasprak
  • Dan Evon
  • Dan MacGuill
  • Bethania Palma
  • Liz Donaldson
  • Vinny Green
  • Ryan Miller
  • Chris Reilly
  • Chad Ort
  • Elyssa Young

Most Snopes assignments begin when readers ask us, “Is this true?” Those tips launch our fact-checkers on sprints across a vast range of political, scientific, legal, historical, and visual information. We investigate as thoroughly and quickly as possible and relay what we learn. Then another question arrives, and the race starts again.

We do this work every day at no cost to you, but it is far from free to produce, and we cannot afford to slow down. To ensure Snopes endures — and grows to serve more readers — we need a different kind of tip: We need your financial support.

Support Snopes so we continue to pursue the facts — for you and anyone searching for answers.

Team Snopes