Claim: Women are being lured out of malls and into dangerous situations with the promise of appearing in television commericals.
Example: [Collected on the Internet, 1998]
Last night on Inside Edition there was an article that is of interest to all women. There is a new scam to abduct women. A man comes up to a women in a Mall or Shopping Center and asks if she likes Pizza, when she says she does he offers her a $100.00 to shoot a commercial for Pizza, but they need to go outside where the lighting is better, when the woman goes out of the mall she is abducted and assaulted.
Another ploy is a very nicely dressed man asks a woman if she would be in a Public Service Announcement to discourage drug use. The man explains that they don’t want professional actors or celebrities they want the average mother to do this. Once she leaves the mall she is a victim.
The third ploy, a very frantic man comes running in and asks a woman to please help him, his baby is not breathing. She runs out of the mall following him and is also a victim.
This has been happening in well lit parking areas in daylight as well as nighttime and the abductor usually uses a Van to abduct the woman. Inside Edition set up a test in a Mall and 10 out of
Please pass this along to your friends and family as now that it has been shown on nationwide TV there are bound to be copy cats of this.
Origins: This scare began circulating on the Internet in August 1998. There’s no reason to worry unduly about clipboard-wielding strangers encountered at the local shopping mall — reports of abductions of this nature are not surfacing in the news, and it’s clear women are not being kidnapped wholesale from malls by way of these ploys.
Inside Edition did air a segment very much as described, on
In an earlier report, we showed you how even the most carefully taught child can fall prey to someone trying to lure them away. Half the kids fell for our safety expert’s trick. But did you ever think that you could be fooled? In another of our safety reports, Janet Tamaro tells us that even adults can fall victim to a dangerous lure.
Showing that something can happen is not the same as reporting that it is happening. That’s an important point; one that should be kept firmly in mind.
Inside Edition’s efforts at capturing women were successful: in the space of three hours, their safety expert did manage to lure 10 of the
As part of the piece, Tamaro interviewed a 24-year-old woman who claimed in 1994 to have been lured off the street (not from a shopping mall) and into a parked van, then assaulted by a man who said his baby was gasping for breath. Such a report makes it appear there might be some basis for concern, but an astute viewer would then ask himself, “If the situation is epidemic, why are they using a four-year-old incident as their only example?”
It is possible there have been one or two such abductions over the years, but even so, nothing on a scale to support a level of hysteria called for in the
Despite the claim of this being “a new scam to abduct women,” kidnappings by deception are neither the norm nor on the increase. Abductions from malls do happen, but they are mostly (if not entirely) of the old-fashioned variety: point a gun at someone’s head, place a knife at the victim’s throat, or pull her into a car. Lethal weapons and force, not guile, remain the tools of choice.
It’s easy to see how the author of this
Inside Edition is not the most reliable of sources. The show’s raison d’etre is to garner a viewership by sensationalism. In this case, the line between “could happen” and “is happening” was intentionally blurred to make a more watchable piece.
In March 2000, this bit of
Dismiss this scare as being born of a tabloid news show’s desire to titillate its viewers. Women just aren’t being grabbed in this fashion, and it doesn’t matter how many “gullibility tests” shows like this air. The problem is not real.
It does pay to be careful around strangers, but this doesn’t have to be taken to extremes, and an
Barbara “petrified doris” Mikkelson
|Lured to Danger? (Inside Edition)|
Last updated: 10 October 2006
A Word to Our Loyal Readers
Support Snopes and make a difference for readers everywhere.
- David Mikkelson
- Doreen Marchionni
- David Emery
- Bond Huberman
- Jordan Liles
- Alex Kasprak
- Dan Evon
- Dan MacGuill
- Bethania Palma
- Liz Donaldson
- Vinny Green
- Ryan Miller
- Chris Reilly
- Chad Ort
- Elyssa Young
Most Snopes assignments begin when readers ask us, “Is this true?” Those tips launch our fact-checkers on sprints across a vast range of political, scientific, legal, historical, and visual information. We investigate as thoroughly and quickly as possible and relay what we learn. Then another question arrives, and the race starts again.
We do this work every day at no cost to you, but it is far from free to produce, and we cannot afford to slow down. To ensure Snopes endures — and grows to serve more readers — we need a different kind of tip: We need your financial support.
Support Snopes so we continue to pursue the facts — for you and anyone searching for answers.