Although switch-hitters (players who can bat both left- and right-handed) are not uncommon, pitchers who can throw with either hand are a rarity. Being able to throw a baseball hard and accurately with either hand requires a much greater level of ambidexterity than switch-hitting does, and even the relative handful of players who are capable of the former typically don't use that ability at the higher professional levels — it's generally thought better for a pitcher to use only his dominant arm than to switch back and forth between sides.
In fact, in the modern era only one pitcher prior to 2015 had faced batters throwing as both a righty and a southpaw in the same game, and that event was something of a gimmick: During a game at the tail end of the 1995 season, the Montreal Expos' Greg Harris, who was just about to retire after 15 years in the majors, threw pitches with both hands during the next-to-last game of his career.
That situation changed on 5 June 2015, when the Oakland A's Pat Venditte, who had just been called up from the minors, entered a game against the Boston Red Sox and pitched left-handed to lefty Brock Holt, then switched his glove to his other hand to face the next two (right-handed) batters. What was more remarkable than Venditte's feat, perhaps, was the way an Associated Press story about it was headlined in the East Oregonian newspaper, imparting to Venditte the ability to throw underwater (or, at least, to live in a submerged state):
Of course, it might have been possible that the editors at East Oregonian (EO) wrote the headline that way on purpose as a sly homage to Yogi Berra, the Hall of Fame catcher and malaprop artist who reportedly once said of a player: "He hits from both sides of the plate. He's amphibious." But alas, the paper admitted it was just a dumb mistake:
We reported on the young amphibious — ahem, ambidextrous — pitcher recently called up by the Oakland Athletics.
Sure, we’re a little red in the face. It’s one thing to have a slip of the tongue, it’s another to put a mistake into print, and it’s still another to see that mistake splayed across the world wide web. And to think: Just a few weeks ago we were Internet heroes, showing the courage and temerity to publish a letter about farts. Now, we’re lowly Internet zeros, publishing unconsciously about frogs.
It’s certainly not the first time we’ve picked up an EO and seen a mistake, from the wrong use of a word to improper grammar to just a plain old typo. For regular readers of any newspaper — a community monthly where one person does all the work, or the Wall Street Journal where an entire department pores over every page looking for goofs — a printed mistake is not uncommon. That’s the nature of words and deadlines and the lack of a delete button once that mistake has been pressed in ink.
No excuses. We’ll own it. It was a dumb mistake and it got through, from our desk to the press to the web. Surely we’ll hear plenty about it in the coming week. Then it will die down, life will go on and we’ll give those proofs closer looks.
Nights waking up in a cold sweat? They aren’t going anywhere anytime soon.