Nearly 20 percent of Donald Trump’s voters disagreed with the freeing of slaves in Southern states after the Civil War.
Nearly 20% of Trump’s voters disagree with the freeing of slaves in Southern states after the Civil War. https://t.co/F1fX7ALpWA — Catherine Rampell (@crampell) February 24, 2016
Collected via e-mail and Twitter, February 2016
On 23 February 2016, New York Times’ “The Upshot” published an item reporting that one in five Trump supporters don’t believe slaves should have been freed:
— Lynn Vavreck (@vavreck) February 23, 2016
The piece largely focused on a “new set of public opinion survey results asking atypical but timely questions [which] has shed some light on the Trump coalition,” pulling together multiple data sets for a broader look at candidates’ voter bases. But readers and pundits focused on one particular portion at the tail end of the article:
Nationally, the YouGov data show a similar trend: Nearly 20 percent of Mr. Trump’s voters disagreed with the freeing of slaves in Southern states after the Civil War. Only 5 percent of Mr. Rubio’s voters share this view. Mr. Trump’s popularity with white, working-class voters who are more likely than other Republicans to believe that whites are a supreme race and who long for the Confederacy may make him unpopular among leaders in his party. But it’s worth noting that he isn’t persuading voters to hold these beliefs. The beliefs were there — and have been for some time.
The “one in five Trump supporters support slavery” claim originated with the following question from a joint poll conducted by polling outfit YouGov and The Economist. The verbiage included the modifier “executive order”:
Do you approve or disapprove of the executive order which freed all slaves in states that were in rebellion against the federal government?
Of the 2,000 respondents, 53 percent said they strongly approved; 17 percent approved somewhat; 8 percent disapproved somewhat; 5 percent disapproved strongly; and 17 percent said they were not sure. Another report, this by Public Policy Polling, appeared to suggest likely Republican voters who identified as “very liberal” or “somewhat liberal” were likelier than those “very conservative” or “somewhat conservative” to indicate “whites [were] a superior race”: The same question was not asked of likely Democrat respondents. PPP provided the following methodology for that poll data collection:
Public Policy Polling surveyed 897 likely Republican primary voters and 525 Democratic primary voters on February 14th and 15th. The margin of error is +/-3.3% for the Republicans and +/-4.3% for the Democrats. 80% of participants, selected through a list based sample, responded via the phone, while 20% of respondents who did not have landlines conducted the survey over the internet through an opt-in internet panel.
That poll appeared to involve 30 percent of 897 likely Republican voters, or approximately 296 individuals. Of those 296 voters, it appeared 112 Trump supporters indicated they wished the South had won the Civil War. And again, the effect of those responses was buffered by the “ideology” breakdown for that question, which appeared to indicate a higher rate of affirmatives among self-identified liberal likely Republican voters, not conservative ones. We searched YouGov’s site for similar polling data in an attempt to locate the core polling data in question, and found a December 2014 piece about general approval for (or disapproval of) the use of executive orders:
Many dislike executive orders as a matter of principle, though that doesn’t mean that the public opposes some of the most important orders in American history … The public was even more supportive – at least to the concept of a president occasionally using an executive order — after it was reminded of specific executive orders, including freeing the slaves in the parts of the country that was in rebellion (the Emancipation Proclamation) and the desegregation of the military. Republicans and Democrats agreed that these were appropriate executive orders. But the percentages supporting the use of executive orders in the two popular historical cases has dropped a bit from February.
Directly beneath it was an interesting breakdown (unrelated to anything Trump) of answers to the same question provided by respondents in 2014: Before Trump ever entered the ring, between 12 and 15 percent of respondents indicated they disapproved of the executive order which freed the Southern slaves. This divide appeared to hinge less on slavery than an ideological opposition among some Americans for executive orders in general. YouGov reported:
This distaste for solo executive orders in principle extends far beyond the issue of immigration: many in the latest Economist/YouGov Poll oppose them in principle. That’s particularly true for Republicans, many of whom are adamant about not permitting executive actions – even for mundane changes in administrative issues – without Congressional approval. The partisan divide seen in so many poll questions extends to principles that are now seen as partisan. Nearly all of the examples of solo executive actions offered in the Economist/YouGov Poll were of executive orders issued by Republican President George W. Bush, though this was not specified. Republicans were consistently less likely than Democrats to support these actions, with the exception of ordering reserves to active duty. In that case a plurality of both Republicans and Democrats say a President should be able to do that.
This question, then, has long been interpreted as something of an ideological purity test about unilateral executive action. If a January or February 2016 poll indicated that 20 percent of Trump’s base answered the question about slavery in the affirmative, that was not a sharp divergence from general polling data in November 2014 involving the same question. Back then (and prior to Trump’s campaign announcement), between 12 and 15 percent of Americans indicated disapproval of that (and all) executive orders. On 25 February 2016, we spoke to Lynn Vavreck (a political science professor at the University of California, Los Angeles and author of the New York Times piece), who explained:
I analyzed the raw data. Basically, I just got the idea that it would be interesting to see if there were differences — take the YouGov data and see are there differences across the candidates’ backers, and whether they agree or disagree with the Emancipation Proclamation. The money here is in the comparison. The number itself, the 20 percent of Trump supporters… you need to compare that to Rubio’s supporters, which is at 4 percent. So this is one more brush stroke on this canvas that says Trump supporters look different than Rubio supporters. So that’s it — it’s the comparison.
At 6:52 PM EST on 25 February 2016, YouGov released the specific breakdown of responses by candidate:
That data displayed as follows:
YouGov’s release of the full tables was the first reference we were able to find showing the breakdown per candidate. By combining those who “disapproved strongly” and “disapproved somewhat” of the Emancipation Proclamation, we reached a figure of 20 percent for supporters of Donald Trump, higher than any other candidate.
Both Cruz and Huckabee’s supporters polled at 15 percent, and Bush’s at 12 percent. Although Trump beat the others in the sum of those responses, it was not by a shocking amount, contrasted with the majority of Republican frontrunners at the time the poll was conducted. Vavreck contrasted Trump’s 20 percent with Rubio’s five, but Kasich was notably more of an outlier with a very modest three percent rating.
Shortly after YouGov tweeted a link to the previously-unavailable data, USA Today‘s David Mastio tweeted us a link to an editorial about the claim:
— David Mastio (@DavidMastio) February 26, 2016
The paper further analyzed the massive larger report, and provided additional context for the purported indictment of Trump’s base:
In the same Economist /YouGov poll:
- 15% of American Hispanics agree with those racist Trump supporters … A quarter of Hispanics are not sure.
- 32% of American blacks back President Franklin Roosevelt’s decision to round up Japanese-Americans and put them in camps during World War II … almost exactly the same percentage as among Trump voters.
- More than 30% of those UNDER 30 are not sure that President Harry Truman’s 1948 executive order desegregating the U.S. military was a good idea. 15% are sure it wasn’t.
- 43% of likely Democratic primary voters, a very liberal slice of America, approve of President George W. Bush’s pro-torture executive order after 9/11.
So, are America’s Hispanics nearly as racist as Trump supporters? Do a third of African-Americans have it in for their Asian countrymen? Are kids raised in the 1980s and later more resistant to desegregation than Americans born when Jim Crow was a thing? Do liberals love waterboarding? … If you dig deep into the confusing Economist/YouGov online poll, you find that only 71% of American blacks approve of the Emancipation Proclamation. Five percent definitely disapprove of Lincoln’s action and 24% just aren’t sure.
The data shifted yet again when viewed through a different lens:
Although 20 percent of likely Trump voters indicated they disapproved of the executive order that freed slaves, 71 percent of white respondents in total said they approved of it (leaving 29 percent presumably in the “disapproval” category). Bizarrely, that number was static for black voters of all parties, and reached only 60 percent for Hispanic voters. Put another way, a different approach to these numbers would suggest more black voters than Trump supporters disapproved of the Emancipation Proclamation (somehow, that didn’t make it into the news cycle).
On 26 February 2016, a representative from YouGov clarified that the breakdown was calculated by Vavrick, and provided numbers for Democratic frontrunners Sanders and Clinton about the “slavery” question. Of Sanders supporters, 81.5 approved and 9.8 percent disapproved, and 85.3 percent of Clinton’s supporters approved, while 6.2 percent disapproved.
It remained true Trump carried the largest share of disapprovers of the “Emancipation Proclamation” question, but that effect of that statistical “brush stroke” appeared less broad on the larger canvas of a diverse American electorate motivated by a number of factors.