On 9 August 2017, the Groopspeak web site reported that the Texas House of Representatives had passed a bill that would force women to purchase “rape insurance.”
The most populous Republican state in the country, the good ole’ state of Texas, has just passed a bill in the House of Representatives that will essentially force women to buy rape insurance if they seek to have an abortion.
Critics of the bill are calling it especially cruel and a detriment to women’s health in general. If put into law, the bill will take effect as soon as Dec. 1 and force women to buy supplemental plans if they wish to have abortions, even if induced by rape.
The article contained excerpts from a Reuters report that quotes Democratic State Representative Chris Turner as using the phrase “rape insurance”:
Women and parents will be faced with the horrific decision of having to purchase ‘rape insurance’ to cover them if they are victimized. This is not only ridiculous, but it is cruel.
The bill in question is House Bill 214. It was passed by the Texas House on 9 July 2017, and a similar bill is currently before the state Senate. If it’s passed there, it will be enacted on 1 December 2017.
The bill would prohibit certain health insurance plans from covering abortions, but would allow women to purchase private supplementary insurance plans that would cover abortions. The bill applies to plans purchased through the Texas health benefit exchange that was set up by the Affordable Care Act, public employee health plans, and several other kinds of insurance.
It allows an exception for medically urgent abortions (those deemed necessary to prevent a woman’s death or serious physical injury) but does not allow an exception for the termination of a pregnancy that arises from rape or incest or abortions where a fetal abnormality has been diagnosed. There are also certain exceptions of a more technical nature.
The Texas House Research Office (HRO) published an analysis of the bill:
HB 214 would prohibit certain health insurance plans from providing coverage for an elective abortion. The bill would not prevent a person from purchasing optional or supplemental coverage for elective abortion under a health benefit plan other than a qualified health plan offered through a health benefit exchange.
The absence of an exception for rape and incest has proven to be the most controversial element of the bill. The HRO analysis articulates opponents’ rationale as follows:
The bill would not include an exception for insurance to cover abortion in the case of rape or incest. Before being faced with such a situation, a woman might not have thought she would need supplemental abortion insurance, which is one reason abortion coverage should not be excluded from basic health insurance plans.
The Groopspeak article’s headline is misleading — women would not be required to purchase additional insurance. However, abortions would no longer be covered in health insurance plans that are part of the Texas Obamacare exchange, meaning that women would be forced to purchase supplementary plans if they wanted to be insured for abortions.
Secondly, the phrase “rape insurance” has only been used by the bill’s opponents as part of their opposition to the bill. While it’s true that women would have to purchase additional insurance to cover abortion in the case of rape, they would also have to purchase additional insurance in order to cover the cost of an abortion for almost any reason, including incest or a fetal abnormality.
A more comprehensive and neutral description of this supplementary insurance would therefore be “abortion insurance,” remembering that the bill still allows across-the-board coverage for terminations deemed medically urgent.