Fact Check

Did US Supreme Court 'End Pelosi’s Reign of Terror' with Impeachment Ruling?

Some headlines don't quite deliver the story they say they do.

Published Dec 30, 2019

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 19:  U.S. Speaker of the House Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks as other House Democrats look on during an event at the Rayburn Room of the U.S. Capitol December 19, 2019 in Washington, DC. House Democrats held an event celebrating the "legislative progress the House Democratic Majority has made For The People in 2019.”  (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) (Getty Images)
Image Via Getty Images
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on impeachment.

A blog post that went viral in December 2019 created the false impression that the U.S. Supreme Court had issued a "landmark decision" favoring President Donald Trump in ongoing impeachment proceedings against him, thereby dealing a blow to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The post, "Supreme Court Ends Pelosi’s Reign of Terror with Landmark Decision on Impeachment," was published on Dec. 17, 2019, and reported that "Nancy Pelosi just got spanked by the Supreme Court in a new impeachment ruling." However, the story did not support what the headline proclaimed.

The Supreme Court has issued no such ruling on ongoing impeachment proceedings. In mid-December 2019, the court agreed to review three separate lower-court rulings against the president that upheld subpoenas from House of Representatives committees seeking Trump's financial records, and a decision that ordered Trump's accounting firm to turn over records to prosecutors in New York City. The cases will not be heard until March 2020, thus no ruling has yet been issued.

As the law blog SCOTUSblog noted of the issue:

The subpoena to Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars, came from the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, while the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One, two of Trump’s lenders, came from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees. The committees said that they wanted the records as part of their work, but Trump argued that the subpoenas do not serve a “legitimate legislative purpose,” as the Supreme Court’s cases require.

[A] subpoena from Manhattan district attorney Cyrus Vance also went to Mazars. As Steve Vladeck has previously reported for this blog, Vance is seeking several years’ worth of Trump’s tax returns as part of a state grand-jury investigation. After the lower courts rejected his efforts to quash the subpoena, Trump went to the Supreme Court, arguing that the subpoena violates the president’s absolute immunity from state criminal proceedings while he is in office.

Trump is facing impeachment proceedings over allegations that he attempted to leverage his public office for personal gain in a scheme to extract damaging information from Ukraine on a potential 2020 electoral rival by withholding military aid to that country. The House voted to impeach Trump on Dec. 18, 2019, on a party-line vote, for abuse of power and obstructing Congress.

Because the headline of the story falsely claims that the Supreme Court had ruled against Pelosi (and in favor of Trump) on impeachment-related cases when it did not, we are rating this claim "False."


Barnes, Robert.   "Supreme Court Will Take Up Trump’s Broad Claims of Protection from Investigation."     The Washington Post.   13 December 2019.

Howe, Amy.   "Justices to Take Up Battle Over Trump Financial Documents."     SCOTUSblog.   13 December 2019.

Savage, Charlie.   "Trump Keeps Losing in Court. But His Legal Strategy Is Winning Anyway."     The New York Times.   27 November 2019.

Bethania Palma is a journalist from the Los Angeles area who started her career as a daily newspaper reporter and has covered everything from crime to government to national politics. She has written for ... read more