Do Studies Show That Tattooed Parents Are More Likely to Neglect Their Children?

A troll’s website from 2015 named “Christians Against Tattoos” produced dubious memes that remained alive and well years later.

  • Published 23 May 2019

Claim

Studies show that tattooed parents are more likely to abuse, neglect, and starve their children.

Rating

Origin

Back in 2015, a “joke” website named “Christians Against Tattoos,” and its associated Facebook page, hit the internet scene, promoting a series of unsubstantiated claims about the dangers of tattoos (and, for some reason, marijuana). The people or person behind this effort created several memes that have continued to hit Snopes’ inbox years later, including claims of studies showing that tattooed individuals make for negligent parents:

That “fact”, and several others that formed the basis of additional memes, were once listed on the Christians Against Tattoos website:

  • Tattoo ink is addictive
  • Tattoo makers (commonly called INKERS) are criminals and bikie gang members
  • Tattooed parents are more than 300% more likely to abuse, neglect and starve their children
  • Over half of all overdoses are from tattoo ink and weed
  • 98% of tattoo ink contains marijuana
  • HEMP is highly addictive
  • You become addicted to ‘grass’ after a single bong injection
  • Injecting weed is extremely lethal -Over 100,000 people die of WEED overdoses every year in the U.S alone
  • Tattooists inject weed ink to get ‘inkys’ addicted and get more money
  • Tattoo money funds terrorist groups including ISIS -Children of tattooed mothers live in fear every single day.

Nothing in the above list was anywhere close to factual. The Facebook page Christians Against Tattoos is categorized as “just for fun,” and a post from the site in July 2015 contained a thinly coded message indicating that the whole operation was a joke:

“If you would like to learn the truth behind our devoted organisation,” the post concluded, “please read the words above in Capital Letters.” Those words form the following sentence: “THIS PAGE IS A COMPLETE JOKE. EVERYBODY WHO BELIEVED THIS SHOULD BE EXTREMELY EMBARRASSED.”

Snopes.com
Since 1994
A Word to Our Loyal Readers

Support Snopes and make a difference for readers everywhere.

Editorial
  • David Mikkelson
  • Doreen Marchionni
  • David Emery
  • Bond Huberman
  • Jordan Liles
  • Alex Kasprak
  • Dan Evon
  • Dan MacGuill
  • Bethania Palma
  • Liz Donaldson
Operations
  • Vinny Green
  • Ryan Miller
  • Chris Reilly
  • Chad Ort
  • Elyssa Young

Most Snopes assignments begin when readers ask us, “Is this true?” Those tips launch our fact-checkers on sprints across a vast range of political, scientific, legal, historical, and visual information. We investigate as thoroughly and quickly as possible and relay what we learn. Then another question arrives, and the race starts again.

We do this work every day at no cost to you, but it is far from free to produce, and we cannot afford to slow down. To ensure Snopes endures — and grows to serve more readers — we need a different kind of tip: We need your financial support.

Support Snopes so we continue to pursue the facts — for you and anyone searching for answers.

Team Snopes