Claim: The closure and removal of Disneyland’s Skyway in November of 1994 was prompted by a guest’s having fallen from the ride several months earlier.
Origins: The reasons
behind the decision to permanently close Disneyland’s Skyway were strictly economic ones that had no connection to the incident earlier in the year in which a man had “fallen” (i.e., jumped) from one of the Skyway cabins.
On Sunday morning, 17 April 1994, a 30-year-old man named Randle Charles fell approximately 20 feet from one of the Skyway cabins and landed in a tree near the “Alice in Wonderland” attraction. He was helped out of the tree by paramedics and taken to nearby Western Medical Center, where he was treated for minor injuries and released. Charles later filed a $25,000 negligence lawsuit against Disney, claiming that he had suffered permanent neck and back injuries as a result of his fall.
Despite the initial assertion of Mr. Charles’ attorney that Randle “wasn’t doing anything improper, and he certainly wasn’t trying to get out of the ride,” Charles indeed jumped, not fell, from his Skyway cabin. Charles’ lawsuit was dismissed just before it was to go to trial on 23 September 1996; at that time he admitted that he “came out” of his Skyway cabin and that his lawsuit against Disney was “ill-advised.”
The unblemished safety record of the Skyway (the 1994 “accident” was the first in the 38-year history of the ride), the obvious dubiousness of Charles’ claim, and the relatively small amount of damages requested in his lawsuit all made this single incident extremely improbable as the reason for the Skyway’s closure on 9 November 1994. The Skyway was not dismantled out of a fear of similar incidents, but for a variety of economic factors, including the attraction’s age and carrying capacity, staffing requirements, maintenance costs, and the expense required to upgrade the Skyway to conform to newer safety and access
Events seemingly repeated themselves five years later. In February 1999, a park custodian at Walt Disney World’s Magic Kingdom was killed when the skyway started up unexpectedly while he was cleaning one of its platforms. Raymond Barlow, 65, was sweeping off a narrow skyway platform inaccessible to park guests an hour after the park’s 9:00 A.M. opening when other cast members, unaware of his presence, started up the ride. Barlow, startled by the approaching gondola, grabbed onto it and tried to climb inside; he fell 40 feet into a flower bed, hitting a tree on the way down, and died. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration later ruled that the area in which Barlow had been working violated federal safety codes and fined Walt Disney World $4,500 for a “serious” violation of safety standards. Several months later, in November 1999, the Magic Kingdom’s skyway was also permanently closed. Once again, the decision to close the attraction was based on factors other than its being involved in a recent accidental death.
Last updated: 23 August 2007
Drummond, Tammerlin. “Disneyland Skyway Rider Hurt in Fall.”
Los Angeles Times. 18 April 1995 (p. B1).
Ellingwood, Ken. “Into Land of No Tomorrows.”
Los Angeles Times. 7 November 1994 (p. B1).
Furst, Randy. “Fall Kills Minnesota Retiree Working at Disney World.”
[Minneapolis] Star Tribune. 16 February 1999 (p. B7).
Rowe, Jeff. “Man Who Sued Disney Now Apologizes for Suit.”
Orange County Register. 24 September 1996 (p. B4).
Scheibal, Steven. “Man Who Fell from Aerial Gondola Sues Disneyland.”
Los Angeles Times. 17 March 1995 (p. D6).
Associated Press. “Disney to Close Magic Kingdom Skyway.”
10 November 1999.
The Orlando Sentinel. “Worker at Disney Plunges to His Death.”
15 February 1999.
The Orlando Sentinel. “Federal Officials Inspect Site of Fatality at Disney.”
18 February 1999.
The Orlando Sentinel. “Disney Is Fined $4,500 in Skyway Death.”
28 April 1999.
The Orlando Sentinel. “Disney Grounds Skyway Ride.”
11 November 1999.
The Orlando Sentinel. “Sun Sets on Skyway Ride at the Magic Kingdom.”
Snopes.com has long been engaged in the battle against misinformation, an effort we could not sustain without support from our audience. Producing reliable fact-checking and thorough investigative reporting requires significant resources. We pay writers, editors, web developers, and other staff who work tirelessly to provide you with an invaluable service: evidence-based, contextualized analysis of facts. Help us keep Snopes.com strong. Make a direct contribution today. Learn More.