Talk radio host Rush Limbaugh was disqualified from the Vietnam-era draft due to a pilonidal cyst.
Vitriolic “hawk vs. dove” debates are a standard feature of modern American politics whenever war is in the offing. Generally pitting Republicans against Democrats, the argument (at its lowest level) boils down to hawks criticizing doves as cowards who don’t understand the military because they never served in it and are too timid about using military force, while the doves maintain that their detractors are cowardly hypocrites who avoided military service themselves while others fought the wars they advocated.
From the latter side comes the term “chickenhawk,” defined (by The New Hampshire Gazette, which maintains a Chickenhawk Database) as “a term often applied to public persons who tend to advocate, or are fervent supporters of those who advocate, military solutions to political problems, and who have personally declined to take advantage of a significant opportunity to serve in uniform during wartime.”
As men of America’s “Vietnam generation” started to become predominant figures in American politics at a national level in the 1990s, service in the Vietnam War was often applied as a “litmus test” issue in political debate. And since talk radio host Rush Limbaugh was one of the most popular media proponents of the conservative political viewpoint and a vociferous critic of a young Bill Clinton’s efforts to avoid the Vietnam-era draft, it was not surprising that the question of Limbaugh’s own military status also became a common subject of interest:
There are similar stories [of avoiding service in Vietnam] about almost every other prominent rightwing Republican of recent vintage. Newt Gingrich,
ex-Speakerof the House, went the Cheney route [of obtaining deferments]; Kenneth Starr, Clinton’s legal nemesis, had psoriasis; Jack Kemp, Dole’s running mate in 1996, was unfit because of a knee injury, though he heroically continued as a National Football League quarterback for another eight years; Pat Buchanan had arthritis in his knees, though he soon became an avid jogger.
The best story concerns Rush Limbaugh, the ferociously bellicose radio personality, who allegedly had either “anal cysts” or an “ingrown hair follicle on his bottom”. It is not my custom to mock others’ ailments, but anyone who has listened to Limbaugh’s programme can imagine the dripping scorn he would bring to the revelation that a prominent Democrat had skipped a war over something like that. Also, in his case, a pain in the arse is peculiarly appropriate.1
When Rush Limbaugh first came of draft age he held a
What was the basis of Limbaugh’s
What was the physical problem that disqualified Rush Limbaugh from the draft? Limbaugh biographer Paul D. Colford noted that “Limbaugh himself … stated that he was not drafted during the Vietnam War because he had been classified
(Technically, Limbaugh’s classification during his primary year of draft eligibility was
Which of the two stated medical reasons was the primary one behind Limbaugh’s
However, that Limbaugh did indeed have a pilonidal cyst seems indisputable, as he himself, his mother, and his brother all maintained that he did:
Yet, for all his father’s patriotism, and deep-rooted fear of Communism, Rusty (Rush) did not enlist to preserve those ideals. The official explanation, David Limbaugh said, is that Rush had a student deferment and, like his father, had a pilonidal cyst on his ass which qualified him for a medical deferment.3
Limbaugh’s mother said in 1993 that she did not know if her son had a physical or not, but she added that he did have a pilonidal cyst like his father.2
Limbaugh critics have maintained that his pilonidal cyst was a “simple-to-treat condition” easily corrected through minor surgery and not a legitimately debilitating condition that precluded his serving in the armed forces — rather, it was simply an excuse he seized upon to avoid military service. However, in general a pilonidal cyst could indeed be a legitimately disqualifying condition:
According to the Military Entrance Processing Command, a pilonidal cyst was then and is today a so-called “disqualifying condition” for induction. It’s a congenital incomplete closure of the neural groove at the base of the spinal cord in which excess tissue and hair may collect and cause discomfort and discharge. The malady can be corrected by surgery, but short of that it is viewed by the military as a needless risk amid unsanitary conditions in the field.2
That the disqualifying condition was a pilonidal cyst and not a bad knee seems to be borne out by Limbaugh’s own comments on his draft status:
Limbaugh’s draft status arose during a 1992 appearance at the 92nd Street
YM-YWHAin Manhattan. ABC newsman Jeff Greenfield, acting as moderator …posed to Limbaugh a written question from the audience about whether he had ever served in the military.
In response, Limbaugh chose his words slowly and cautiously. He seemed to be saying that he had not known ahead of time that whatever physical condition he had in 1970 would free him from draft consideration.
“I had student deferments in college and, upon taking a physical, was discovered to have a physical — uh, by virtue of what the military says, I didn’t even know it
existed — aphysical deferment and then the lottery system came along, when they chose your lot by birthdate, and mine was high. And I did not want to go — just as Governor Clinton didn’t.”2
It’s highly unlikely that Limbaugh only “discovered” he had a high school football knee injury several years after the fact or was unaware that a bad knee was reason for a physical deferment, so the pilonidal cyst is the more probable explanation.
(The lottery issue is largely irrelevant since Limbaugh’s
CALLER: And Rush you never mentioned how you dodged the Vietnam draft.
LIMBAUGH: I didn’t.
CALLER: Yes, you did. You claimed you had a boil on your
LIMBAUGH: No, you see, that’s part of popular mythology that is out there that I have not whined nor complained about, Greg. But that is just a bunch of internet BS and hyperbole. Never happened. Was not the cause, wasn’t the case.
These kinds of responses, provided by Limbaugh on his show and available on the rushlimbaugh.com web site, sounded unconvincing. Why not just give a straightforward answer to the question? After all, “I had a knee injury” is a simple explanation (and hardly an embarrassing one), but dismissing the issue as “Internet BS” and railing against “Internet conspiracy theories” sound too much like the response of someone who is evading the question.
Instead, Limbaugh provided non-responsive “answers” when queries about his draft status were posed by quickly steering the focus away from himself and claiming that “the message is that unless you’ve been a member of the military, you have no right to support it.” Of course, that wasn’t the message at all: the message was about whether it’s hypocritical for those who themselves avoided the draft to criticize others who also did.
There is, of course, a huge difference between draft evasion (or “draft dodging”) and draft avoidance: The former involves the use of unethical or illegal means (e.g., bribing a doctor to falsify a medical report, fleeing the country) to escape military service; the latter involves taking advantage of established legal means (e.g., college deferments, conscientious objector status) to avoid or delay military service. The issue discussed here is clearly not one of draft evasion, and the matter of who is justified in criticizing whom for not serving in Vietnam is a gray area to be hashed out in the public arena. The only conclusions drawn here are that Rush Limbaugh was ineligible for the draft due to a physical condition, that he had a pilonidal cyst, and that if there’s an explanation for his draft status other than the cyst, he has yet to offer it.
A Word to Our Loyal Readers
Support Snopes and make a difference for readers everywhere.
- David Mikkelson
- Doreen Marchionni
- David Emery
- Bond Huberman
- Jordan Liles
- Alex Kasprak
- Dan Evon
- Dan MacGuill
- Bethania Palma
- Liz Donaldson
- Vinny Green
- Ryan Miller
- Chris Reilly
- Chad Ort
- Elyssa Young
Most Snopes assignments begin when readers ask us, “Is this true?” Those tips launch our fact-checkers on sprints across a vast range of political, scientific, legal, historical, and visual information. We investigate as thoroughly and quickly as possible and relay what we learn. Then another question arrives, and the race starts again.
We do this work every day at no cost to you, but it is far from free to produce, and we cannot afford to slow down. To ensure Snopes endures — and grows to serve more readers — we need a different kind of tip: We need your financial support.
Support Snopes so we continue to pursue the facts — for you and anyone searching for answers.