Claim: Ferguson protests were all planned and organized by Communists, as proved by their identifiable and professionally printed signs.
Examples: [Collected via e-mail, December 2014]
Ever wonder where the signs used in the protests come from and so fast. And professional as well. They are obviously manufactured signs. It take’s time to make signs like that. So, one has to think this protest was planned way ahead of time. And who pays for them??
If you were watching the news broadcast from Ferguson, Mo. before the indictment decision was announced, you undoubtedly saw many people holding up signs reflecting their sentiments. On the bottom of the signs is the inscription revcom. The name below signs appear to be in NYC protests.
Now protest movements in Ferguson and around the country make a lot more sense when you see who prints up these protest signs!
All this protesting is planned and it has a reason that may make since when
you check it out.
Origins: In December 2014, protests and demonstrations spread from Ferguson, Missouri, to
Soon after demonstrations commenced in New York, a rumor began to circulate that the protests were not an organic movement. According to the rumor, printed signs carried by the protesters offered a clue as to who was behind all of the demonstrations, both ideologically and financially: circulating messages directed recipients to investigate the website revcom.us, a site that identified itself as “the voice of the Revolutionary Communist Party, USA.” The rumor was frequently accompanied by one of two images depicting protesters at demonstrations in
Google this "revcom.us" see who is behind Ferguson protest. SURPRISED? pic.twitter.com/Joxmd4NiU5
— MIKE WAYNE (@target2016) December 27, 2014
— UCSB87 (@UCSB87) December 26, 2014
Perhaps due to an absence of additional images supporting the claim, a secondary rumor arose, one holding that protest images were being “airbrushed” to remove evidence of the Communist link:
— #BlueLivesMatter (@DefendWallSt) November 30, 2014
However, the image cited as having been “airbrushed” to eliminate the Communist group’s URL was taken not in the United States, but was part of a
Other netizens repeated the belief images were being edited to remove the revcom.us tag:
Look for REVCOM.US at the bottom of their signs. They’ve started snipping that off recently, once people figured it out.
A notable aspect of the claim concerns its examples (or their absence), as few images have emerged to evidence the belief that a Communist group backed or initiated all of the Ferguson-related protests. If we are to believe all such protests were organized by Communists, we must also conclude this massive orchestration of civil unrest occurred
without a single mention of its choreography on social media sites such as Twitter or Facebook.
No measurably collusive chatter has occurred to suggest Communists (or any single entity) provoked, funded, or otherwise facilitated all of the protests or demonstrations in any city. It is certainly possible some demonstrations were centrally organized (including the printing and distribution of signs made available at protests for attendees to carry), but there’s a gulf of difference between providing placards and organizing every single demonstration in multiple cities, involving thousands of individuals, without the use of social media services and leaving no traces whatsoever of such a large initiative.
Finally, a number of images illustrating protest signs in Ferguson and elsewhere are readily available on the Internet and social media sites. The vast majority of signage, while often uniform in wording, was handwritten, and many of the signs seen in widely circulated protest images resembled one another stylistically:
As noted above, it was claimed identifying information was removed from protest signs when eagle-eyed individuals began to connect the dots and discover who was really behind the protests. However, the initial rumor began in December 2014, and the first image above (with no URL appended) was taken in October 2014.
Signs similar in feel to the signs pictured above were spotted in several locations, but the revcom.us URL was never associated with nor appended to those signs. It’s possible the continued presence of generally uniform signs became conflated with the rumor the signs were produced or distributed with the URL in question on them and falsely created the impression of widespread sightings. However, the revcom.us signs and the far more commonly observed ones seen above do not resemble one another and do not appear to be connected. It is not clear where protesters obtained the black signs with white lettering, but they are not associated with revcom.us.
Last updated: 28 December 2014
A Word to Our Loyal Readers
Support Snopes and make a difference for readers everywhere.
- David Mikkelson
- Doreen Marchionni
- David Emery
- Bond Huberman
- Jordan Liles
- Alex Kasprak
- Dan Evon
- Dan MacGuill
- Bethania Palma
- Liz Donaldson
- Vinny Green
- Ryan Miller
- Chris Reilly
- Chad Ort
Most Snopes assignments begin when readers ask us, “Is this true?” Those tips launch our fact-checkers on sprints across a vast range of political, scientific, legal, historical, and visual information. We investigate as thoroughly and quickly as possible and relay what we learn. Then another question arrives, and the race starts again.
We do this work every day at no cost to you, but it is far from free to produce, and we cannot afford to slow down. To ensure Snopes endures — and grows to serve more readers — we need a different kind of tip: We need your financial support.
Support Snopes so we continue to pursue the facts — for you and anyone searching for answers.