In March 2018, amid political upheaval in South Africa as Cyril Ramaphosa replaced former president Jacob Zuma, who resigned in a cloud of corruption charges, rumors flew about extreme violence as its new government weighed land expropriation — in which unused farmland would be taken from the rich and given to the poor — which has created rumors that a violent white genocide is underway.
Propagandists enthusiastically jumped on that narrative, seizing onto a photograph which purportedly shows a young white child who had been horribly brutalized and given a “Joker smile” (a reference to the comic book character the Joker, in which the victim’s face is sliced or split from the corners of their mouth to their ears, making cuts and scars appear in the shape of a smile; it is also called a Chelsea smile or a Glasgow smile) by local “savages.”
This image has been associated with the claim that a white genocide was occurring in South Africa since at least October 2017, but it received wider attention a few months later when it was shared by Twitter user @BasedStickman_, a far-right activist whose real name is Kyle Chapman:
This image was later re-shared on 4Chan, where it was posted along with messages littered with racial slurs encouraging users to spread the false story on social media:
The black parliament in South Africa recently voted on a law to confiscate white owned farms.
Among many other things, whites are being attacked, killed, raped, and forced to live in ghettos. The few whites that live in houses are forced into gated communities.
This is all happening now – whether you like it or not white genocide is happening.
The only thing you can do about it is to spread awareness. Twitter, Instagram your friends/family – anyone. The more people who are aware of it the better.
We can start a hashtag on twitter and we can try to get it trending. Posting images/articles of women and children getting assaulted, raped etc is the best way to reach the hearts of the western world.
Do your part, nothing is too little or too much.
This image, however, does not show a little girl who had a “Joker smile” carved into her face by “savages” in South Africa. It is a reappropriated image of a little girl who suffered horrendous injuries after being attacked by a dog.
Charlaine survived the attack and received 70 stitches to her face. We were also able to locate images of her during her recovery:
Violent farm attacks (called plaasmoorde in Afrikaans) are a genuine problem in South Africa; however, despite wild claims by far-right figures that these attacks amount to a “white genocide,” many international outlets note that there is not enough reliable data to tell if white farmers are specifically being targeted.
As fact-checking site Africa Check says, it is nearly impossible to calculate because of both lack of agreement on what constitutes “farm murders,” and fuzzy math further clouding the issue:
In a recent debate in South Africa’s parliament, two different farm murder rates were shared.
“The farm murder rate is 133 per 100,000,” Freedom Front Plus member of parliament, Pieter Groenewald, told fellow parliamentarians.
But 45 minutes later, the African Christian Democratic Party’s Steve Swart cited a lower figure.
Is it possible to calculate an accurate farm murder rate? We looked into it.
Both Groenewald and Swart told Africa Check that Johan Burger, a senior research consultant in the governance, crime and justice division at the Institute for Security Studies, was the source of their claims.
Africa Check asked Burger how he calculated the figures.
“This was never meant to be a scientifically accurate fact, only an estimate to show how serious the situation is,” Burger said. “The size of the numbers involved also makes this type of calculation at best an indication rather than a scientifically acceptable ratio.”
This sentiment was echoed by Gareth Newham, head of the crime and justice programme at the Institute for Security Studies.
“I do not really know how one could get an accurate estimate of the murder and attack rate on farms given the complexities involved,” Newham told Africa Check.
This image has nothing to with farm attacks or an alleged white genocide in South Africa. Propagandists simply used an image of a severely wounded child in order to elicit a strong emotional reaction from viewers in an attempt to further a specific agenda.