Claim: Actor-director Clint Eastwood is the son of comic Stan Laurel.
Example: [Collected on the Internet, November 2011]
It has long been a suppressed piece of information that Clint Eastwood is in fact the son of comedy legend Stan Laurel. I suppose Clint has never wanted his tough guy image to be associated with the simple character that Stan portrayed in over 100 Laurel & Hardy pictures.
Origins: Urban legendry abounds with rumors concerning famous people who are supposedly the unacknowledged (and usually illegitimate) children of other famous people, especially within the Hollywood community (actors being noted in the world of rumor for both their promiscuity and their willingness to go to extreme lengths to avoid the disclosure of negative publicity.) One of the odder rumors of this variety posits that western film star
Indeed, sources that attempt to explain the origins of this rumor don’t generally offer anything more substantive than that a newspaper or magazine article once noted Eastwood and Laurel looked somewhat alike:
The source of the myth was an Italian newspaper from the days that Clint Eastwood was making spaghetti westerns in Italy. An article on Eastwood was illustrated by a portrait of a happily smiling Eastwood and the caption pointed out the likeness to Stan smiling. A British Kids comic printed a photo of Clint with his hair sticking up on end. Somebody wrote to the comic saying his spiky hair looked like Stan’s. So the next week they printed their photos side by side with a ‘JOKE’ caption saying that ‘Who knows, Clint could be Stan’s son’.
Perhaps the most amusing [piece of Laurel & Hardy apocrypha] is a belief that actor and director Clint Eastwood might be Stan Laurel’s son; varying sources attribute the myth either to a foreign magazine or, incredibly, a letter to a children’s comic remarking on the resemblance between the two.
The source of the myth was an Italian newspaper from the days that Clint Eastwood was making spaghetti westerns in Italy. An article on Eastwood was illustrated by a portrait of a happily smiling Eastwood and the caption pointed out the likeness to Stan smiling.
A British Kids comic printed a photo of Clint with his hair sticking up on end. Somebody wrote to the comic saying his spiky hair looked like Stan’s. So the next week they printed their photos side by side with a ‘JOKE’ caption saying that ‘Who knows, Clint could be Stan’s son’.
Although they may not have spawned the rumors, some aspects of the two men’s personal lives may have helped keep it going once it got started. One factor is that Clint Eastwood has always been quite reticent about discussing the details of his private life (he successfully sued the National Enquirer tabloid in 1993 after it falsely claimed to have interviewed
him for a cover story entitled “Dirty Harry Lifts the Lid on His Private Life”), a circumstance which makes reliable information about his background more difficult to obtain and provides a fertile breeding ground for rumors.
Another factor is the coincidence that Clint Eastwood’s birth date is given as
In any case, there is no mystery or surprise in the details of Clint Eastwood’s
ancestry: He was born on
Last updated: 21 June 2013
Louvish, Simon. Stan and Ollie. New York: Thomas Dunne Books, 2002. ISBN 0-312-26651-0. McGilligan, Patrick. Clint: The Life and Legend. New York: HarperCollins, 2000. ISBN 0-006-38354-8. Mitchell, Glenn. The Laurel & Hardy Encyclopedia. London: B.T. Batsford Ltd., 1995. ISBN 0-7134-7711-3. Morgan, Hal and Kerry Tucker. More Rumor! New York: Penguin Books, 1987. ISBN 0-14-009720-1 (pp. 77-78). Schickel, Richard. Clint Eastwood: A Biography. New York: Vintage Books, 1997. ISBN 0-679-74991-8.
A Word to Our Loyal Readers
Support Snopes and make a difference for readers everywhere.
- David Mikkelson
- Doreen Marchionni
- David Emery
- Bond Huberman
- Jordan Liles
- Alex Kasprak
- Dan Evon
- Dan MacGuill
- Bethania Palma
- Liz Donaldson
- Vinny Green
- Ryan Miller
- Chris Reilly
- Chad Ort
- Elyssa Young
Most Snopes assignments begin when readers ask us, “Is this true?” Those tips launch our fact-checkers on sprints across a vast range of political, scientific, legal, historical, and visual information. We investigate as thoroughly and quickly as possible and relay what we learn. Then another question arrives, and the race starts again.
We do this work every day at no cost to you, but it is far from free to produce, and we cannot afford to slow down. To ensure Snopes endures — and grows to serve more readers — we need a different kind of tip: We need your financial support.
Support Snopes so we continue to pursue the facts — for you and anyone searching for answers.