Bill Nye proposed penalizing families with too many children to reduce population growth and slow climate change.
In late April 2017, Netflix personality Bill Nye (best known to U.S. television audiences as “the Science Guy”) provoked a social media backlash by asking guests on his show Bill Nye Saves the World whether governments in developed countries ought to impose penalties on parents who have “extra kids.”
The question, posed during a discussion on coping with climate change to Johns Hopkins University bioethicist Travis Rieder and two other panelists (women’s and reproductive health experts Rachel Snow and Nerys Benfield), was condemned as “dystopic”, “authoritarian”, and worse by politically motivated critics:
ABORTIONS NOT ENOUGH FOR THE LEFT?
— Liberty News 1776 (@LibertyNews1776) April 27, 2017
An article on the right-leaning web site DailyWire.com accused Nye of raising the specter of Nazism:
In the 13th and final episode of Bill Nye, The-Not-A-Scientist-Guy’s new Netflix series, the hardcore, human-hating leftist who chases trendy science like Bill Clinton chases tail, moved things in a rather dark and some might say Nazi-ish direction while discussing the issue of population control.
On FoxNews.com, Todd Starnes labeled Nye “one diabolical sicko,” adding:
It’s frightening to imagine a nation where parents are punished for having what the left considers too many babies.
I thought liberals wanted the government out of our bedrooms – but now they want to deputize government agents to police American baby-making.
Perhaps Netflix should consider producing a new television program – Bill Nye the Eugenics Guy.
Such reactions completely ignored the nature and context of the discussion, however. As a bioethicist, it is Rieder’s job to seriously consider and propose answers to such questions. Moreover, the issue was debated by Nye’s three panelists, who were not unanimous in their opinions:
Bill Nye: “So, should we have policies that penalize people for having extra kids in the developed world?”
Travis Rieder: “So, I do think that we should at least consider it.”
Bill Nye: “Well, ‘at least consider it’ is like, ‘do it.'”
Travis Rieder: “One of the things that we could do that’s kind of least policy-ish is we could encourage our culture and our norms to change right.”
Rachel Snow: “I would take issue with the idea that we do anything to incentivize fewer children or more children, I think it’s all about, this is where it’s justice, it’s human rights we’re really clear people should have the you know have the number of children they want, the timing of children, and if some families have five or six children god bless them, I mean that’s fine well but most people end up with fewer.”
Nerys Benfield: “But when you talk about penalties who are you going to end up penalizing, right?”
The bottom line is that Nye instigated an open discussion on the propriety of imposing penalties to control population growth. He neither proposed nor advocated such a measure.
A Word to Our Loyal Readers
Support Snopes and make a difference for readers everywhere.
- David Mikkelson
- Doreen Marchionni
- David Emery
- Bond Huberman
- Jordan Liles
- Alex Kasprak
- Dan Evon
- Dan MacGuill
- Bethania Palma
- Liz Donaldson
- Vinny Green
- Ryan Miller
- Chris Reilly
- Chad Ort
- Elyssa Young
Most Snopes assignments begin when readers ask us, “Is this true?” Those tips launch our fact-checkers on sprints across a vast range of political, scientific, legal, historical, and visual information. We investigate as thoroughly and quickly as possible and relay what we learn. Then another question arrives, and the race starts again.
We do this work every day at no cost to you, but it is far from free to produce, and we cannot afford to slow down. To ensure Snopes endures — and grows to serve more readers — we need a different kind of tip: We need your financial support.
Support Snopes so we continue to pursue the facts — for you and anyone searching for answers.