Claim:   The character of Ensign Chekov was added to the television series Star Trek because an editorial in the Communist newspaper Pravda had criticized the lack of a Soviet crewman on board the U.S.S. Enterprise.

Status:   Multiple.

Origins:   In the days before cable TV (and the myriad other entertainments that have since sprung up to sap our attention), the networks reigned supreme in the television industry. Landing a series in the prime time line-up of one of the "big three" (CBS, NBC, and ABC), where competition was fierce for the few slots that opened up each year, was a TV producer's ultimate achievement. Keeping his series on the air after having secured a network spot for it was a TV producer's next greatest achievement.

It was with justifiable pride, then, that Gene Roddenberry found himself considering ways to enhance the popularity of his new Star Trek series in September 1966. After years of planning and effort (including the unusual circumstance of his having to produce two separate pilots with two different casts), Roddenberry had managed to convince NBC to take a chance on something outside the usual tried-and-true westerns and family sitcoms that dominated network schedules: a non-anthology science fiction series set on a space ship three hundred years in the future. The chances of landing such a show with a network had been slim; the chances of keeping it there were even slimmer. So it's no wonder that even though only two episodes of Star Trek had been aired, its creator/producer was already thinking ahead its next season. With an eye towards higher ratings, Roddenberry wrote a memo to casting director Joe D'Agosta on 22 September 1966 which said:

Keeping our teenage audience in mind, also keeping aware of current trends, let's watch for a young, irreverent, English-accent "Beatle" type to try on the show, possibly with an eye to him reoccurring. Like the smallish fellow who looks to be a hit on The Monkees. Personally, I find this type spirited and refreshing and I think our episode could use that kind of "lift." Let's discuss.

If the wording and date of this memo are accurate, Roddenberry was prescient indeed. By 22 September 1966, The Monkees (which, like Star Trek, was never a ratings winner during its original run) had aired but two episodes, both of which had lost their time slot in the ratings war to Gilligan's Island. And "Last Train to Clarksville," the Monkees' first record, had yet to crack the Top 40 on Billboard's singles chart. Roddenberry must have been following the television industry (and the teen market) quite keenly to have caught on to Davy Jones' nascent popularity so quickly.

The new character Roddenberry suggested did show up during Star Trek's second season in 1967-68 in the person of an ensign serving as the ship's navigator and junior science officer, as portrayed by actor Walter Koenig. The character's Beatlesque/Monkeesque origins were demonstrated by the "mop-top" wig placed atop Koenig's head for his first few episodes until his own hair grew out to a suitable length. (As William Shatner recalled, "the rather bushy toupee he was forced to wear will illustrate the Monkee mimicry point beyond a shadow of a doubt." And Koenig himself complained that "swallows kept trying to nest in the wig they gave me.") However, rather than employing a Manchester accent similar to Davy Jones', Koenig's character spoke in a distinctively Russian accent, one that went with the character's name: Pavel Chekov. So what happened to the "English-accent type" Roddenberry had so eagerly spoken of adding to the cast a year earlier? Herb Solow, the Vice President of Production at Desilu Studios, where Star Trek was produced, later explained:

Pravda, the official newspaper of the Communist Party, had criticized Star Trek as being "typically capitalistic" and questioned why there was no Russian crewman aboard the Enterprise. After all, the Soviets were doing quite well in the race for outer space.

Roddenberry liked the idea. By having someone from behind the Iron Curtain on "our side," he intended to show that people with opposing philosophies not only could learn to get along, but could in fact set aside their differences and cooperate to bring about a better future for humankind.

This was the same explanation of Chekov's origins that had been offered in the Roddenberry-vetted book The Making of Star Trek, published back when the series was still in production:

The Chekov thing was a major error on our part, and I'm still embarrassed by the fact that we didn't include a Russian right from the beginning. However, now it's Russia's turn to be embarrassed. After we wrote Chekov into the show, we sent a long, polite letter to the minister of cultural affairs in Moscow, apologizing for the error and telling him about Chekov. That was over a year ago, and they still haven't answered us. So we're square.

This explains Chekov's transformation from an Englishman to a Russian quite nicely. Or does it?

Did Pravda really run an editorial critical of Star Trek's lack of Russian crew members? It seems rather unlikely, given that Star Trek didn't air in the Soviet Union during its original run, and the decidedly pro-American Cold War allegories that furnished the plots for numerous episodes of the series weren't exactly the sort of material the Soviets would have wanted to be associated with. Moreover, evidently nobody associated with Star Trek ever saw the alleged editorial; everyone merely heard about it from someone else. Roddenberry himself said he hadn't seen the editorial: he claimed he had been told about it by one of the show's actors around the end of 1966. (Roddenberry didn't identify which actor told him this, but it's doubtful that anyone in the Star Trek cast would have been reading Pravda.) If Roddenberry truly wondered why nobody in Moscow answered his letter, perhaps it was because they had no idea what he was talking about?

William Shatner (or his ghostwriter) wrote the whole thing off as a publicity stunt in his book of reminiscences about the show, Star Trek Memories:

You've heard this story, I'm sure: In early 1967, the Soviet newspaper Pravda writes a long, angry editorial, complaining that even though the USSR was first in space, there is no Russian aboard the U.S.S. Enterprise. Gene Roddenberry gets hold of the scathing condemnation of his xenophobic American television show, reads it over several times and finally comes to the conclusion that the paper's arguments are well founded. With that in mind, he goes back into his office and immediately creates the character of Ensign Pavel Chekov.

That's the story. Here's the truth: This long-established, widely believed bit of Star Trek history is entirely false, and was simply the product of an overzealous public relations department.

What to believe? Roddenberry was famous for his myth-making, so this tale certainly sounds like something he could have made up. William Shatner, star of the series, claimed it was a public relations stunt, but we wouldn't give his word too much credence: actors aren't necessarily privy to off-the-set dealings, and Shatner likely was merely repeating something he heard second-hand long after the fact.

However, apparently there is at least something to the Pravda story, as the 1996 book Inside Star Trek: The Real Story (by Desilu executive Herb Solow and Star Trek Associate Producer Robert Justman) reproduces a 1967 letter from Gene Roddenberry (on Star Trek letterhead) to the editor of Pravda, informing the latter of Chekov's addition to the cast. Unless the letter was a latter-day forgery created to lend support to a publicity stunt, it would indicate that Roddenberry at least believed Pravda had run such an editorial, whether they genuinely did or not.

All of this conflicting information makes it difficult to assign a "True" or "False" status to the claim stated at the top of this page. In a strict sense, one could say it isn't true that the Chekov character was added to the Star Trek cast because of a editorial in Pravda (whether or not such an editorial was ever actually published), since Gene Roddenberry had already been thinking about creating a part for "Monkees-like" actor in the show. However, one might impart some truth to the claim in the sense that Roddenberry's belief that Pravda had run such an editorial might have influenced his decision to make the new character's nationality Russian rather than British. On the other hand, one might maintain the claim is literally false, since there is no evidence (other than hearsay) that Pravda published an editorial critical of Star Trek's lack of Soviet crew members.

Our estimation is that the story about a Pravda was not cooked up as a publicity stunt, due to the simple fact that it wasn't publicized at the time. The account of how the Chekov character was added to the Star Trek crew to put those complaining Soviets in their place wasn't trumpeted in the media at the time it supposedly happened — as far as we can tell, it was only mentioned in the book The Making of Star Trek (not exactly a best-seller) over a year after Chekov's debut, hardly a timely or effective way of creating buzz with a cooked-up PR invention. We doubt Pravda actually did run an editorial about Star Trek, but we also doubt that even Gene Roddenberry would have forged a back-dated letter to support the claim that they did, so we think it likely he genuinely believed they had. How much any of this might have influenced Roddenberry's decision to make the added Star Trek character played by Walter Koenig a Russian, we can't tell.

Last updated:   11 April 2005

Urban Legends Reference Pages © 1995-2013 by Barbara and David P. Mikkelson.
This material may not be reproduced without permission.
snopes and the snopes.com logo are registered service marks of snopes.com.  

---

  Sources:

    Shatner, William.   Star Trek Memories.

    New York: HarperCollins, 1993.   ISBN 0-06-017734-9   (p. 224).

    Solow, Herbert F. and Robert H. Justman.   Inside Star Trek: The Real Story.

    New York: Pocket Books, 1996.   ISBN 0-671-00974-5   (pp. 343-345).

    Whitfield, Stephen E.   The Making of Star Trek.

    New York: Ballantine Books, 1968.   ISBN 0-345-34019-1   (pp. 249-251).