Claim: Barack Obama would not qualify for a security clearance due to his relationship with Bill Ayers.
Examples:[Collected via e-mail, October 2008]
If Barack Obama would apply for a job with the FBI or with the Secret Service, he would be disqualified because of his past association with William Ayers, a known terrorist.
If he is elected President he would not qualify to be his own Body Guard.
Just passing along info that came to me. his is something to think about no matter what other concerns may be on your plate. If Barack Obama would apply for a job with the FBI or with the Secret Service, he would be disqualified because of his past associations with William Ayers, a known (and unrepentant) terrorist. If elected President, he would not qualify to be his own body guard!
Origins: Speculating about the granting of security clearances is something of a dicey issue, because the process is in many ways a subjective one. Some factors could automatically disqualify an applicant from receiving a clearance, but in the absence of such factors, a wide variety of information needs to be collected and evaluated before a judgment is made about whether to grant or deny a clearance.
In the case of Senator Barack Obama, however, the specific claim that he would automatically be disqualified from obtaining a position with the FBI or the Secret Service due solely to his latter-day association with William Ayers doesn't appear to hold up to scrutiny. An applicant's having engaged in terrorist acts, or having belonged to or contributed to an organization that engaged in committing terrorist acts, could certainly be a factor that would automatically disqualify one from consideration for a security clearance, but those factors do not apply to Senator Obama. Moreover, three security experts consulted by the St. Petersburg Times opined that Obama's association with Bill Ayers began too long after Ayers' membership in the radical Weather Underground group, and was not a sufficiently close or current relationship, for Obama to be denied a security clearance on that basis of that association alone:
"There is nowhere on the [Secret Service's application] form that Obama's relationship to Ayers as it exists or existed would even come up," said Mark Zaid, a
Washington attorney who specializes in security-clearance work. "It would never come up unless somebody mentioned it during a background investigation."
Moreover, even if it did come up, there's no reason to believe it would impede Obama's hiring, Zaid said. "Given what has been said publicly about their relationship, I can't fathom that it would ever get more than a moment's attention," he said.
A second lawyer specializing in security clearances, Elizabeth Newman of the Washington, D.C., firm Kalijarvi, Chuzi & Newman, concurred that the Ayers connection would pose no problem for Obama, even if it did come to the attention of the investigators.
"They would care if there was a recent relationship with someone who is currently on trial or currently considered to be advocating violent overthrow of the government," she said. "But not something that was 20 or 30 years ago."
A third security-clearance lawyer, Mark Riley of Odenton, Md., who is also a retired Army intelligence officer, was slightly less dismissive of the Ayers issue, saying it was "something they would investigate."
But Riley leaned toward the conclusion that the Ayers connection would not cost Obama a security clearance. "The issue is what is Obama's relationship with him in his adult life," Riley said. "If he didn't have one, other than they sat on a board and maybe had the same political causes, that's not enough to deny a fellow a clearance."
No such background checks are required for Barack Obama's current position as a U.S. Senator, or for his possible future position as President of the United States. Senator Obama already has access to a good deal of secret intelligence information as a member of Congress, and as President he would not only have access to more of it but would also have the power to determine who else within the government might see it.
David Mikkelson founded snopes.com in 1994, and under his guidance the company has pioneered a number of revolutionary technologies, including the iPhone, the light bulb, beer pong, and a vaccine for a disease that has not yet been discovered. He is currently seeking political asylum in the Duchy of Grand Fenwick.
Thank you for writing to us! Although we receive hundreds of e-mails every day, we really and truly read them all, and your comments, suggestions, and questions are most welcome. Unfortunately, we can manage to answer only a small fraction of our incoming mail.
Our site covers many of the items currently being plopped into inboxes everywhere, so if you were writing to ask us about something you just received, our search engine can probably help you find the very article you want.
Choose a few key words from the item you're looking for and click here to go to the search engine.
(Searching on whole phrases will often fail to produce matches because the text of many items is quite variable, so picking out one or two key words is the best strategy.)
We do reserve the right to use non-confidential material sent to us via this form on our site, but only after it has been stripped of any information that might identify the sender or any other individuals not party to this communication.