Claim: A woman sued her ex-boyfriend for surreptitiously tattooing a pile of excrement on her back.
Example:[Collected via e-mail, November 2011]
Tattoo artist Ryan Fitzgerald from Dayton, OH was hit with a $100,000 lawsuit last week by his ex-girlfriend Rossie Brovent. She claims that her boyfriend was supposed to tattoo a scene from Narnia on her back but instead tattooed an image of a pile of excrement with flies buzzing around it. It this true?
Origins: In November 2011, news outlets (such as the UK's Sun) picked up a news story about a "furious woman suing her ex-boyfriend after he tattooed a steaming poo on her back":
Rossie Brovent wants £60,000 in damages from Ryan Fitzjerald.
Rossie, from Dayton, Ohio, US, wanted a scene from the Narnia trilogy inked
on her back.
Instead she was left with a pile of excrement with flies buzzing around it.
Tattoo artist Ryan turned rogue after discovering that Rossie had cheated on him with his best friend.
Rossie originally tried to have her ex-lover charged with assault but she had signed a consent form agreeing the tattoo design was "at the artist's discretion".
She said: "He tricked me by drinking a bottle of cheap wine with me and doing tequila shots before I signed it and got the tattoo."
"Actually I was passed out for most of the time, and woke up to this horrible image on my back."
However, as other news outlets (such as the Daily Mail) found after investigating the story, it didn't pan out: the proffered photograph was a much older one that had originally appeared in a different context and had since been reused to illustrate a fabricated backstory. As the Smoking Gun noted of the claim:
The photo appears legitimate. In fact, it first surfaced online about 18 months ago as part of a "Worst Tattoo of the Day" post on the blog I Am Bored.
The image reappeared this week — complete with a backstory about the fractured love of "Rossie" and "Ryan" — on a sketchy "weird news" web site that appears to be dedicated to ginning up its Google AdSense impressions.
A review of court indices, of course, shows no such civil complaint has ever been filed (either in federal or state court) by "Brovent." James Druber, administrator of the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court (where Dayton residents file their six-figure complaints), said that he had heard nothing about the purported tattoo lawsuit.
Records for Dayton and Montgomery County show no evidence that "Fitzjerald" (or "Fitzgerald") has been licensed as a tattoo parlor operator or employee, according to Alan Pierce, an official with the Public Health department.
Exactly who is pictured in the original photograph, and what the tattoo shown was intended to depict, remain unknown. Some viewers have suggested that the tattoo might be a representation of moths being drawn to a candle flame that is sitting atop a pile of stones rather than of flies buzzing around a pile of feces.
founded snopes.com in 1994, and under his guidance the company has pioneered a number of revolutionary technologies, including the iPhone, the light bulb, beer pong, and a vaccine for a disease that has not yet been discovered. He is currently seeking political asylum in the Duchy of Grand Fenwick.
Thank you for writing to us! Although we receive hundreds of e-mails every day, we really and truly read them all, and your comments, suggestions, and questions are most welcome. Unfortunately, we can manage to answer only a small fraction of our incoming mail.
Our site covers many of the items currently being plopped into inboxes everywhere, so if you were writing to ask us about something you just received, our search engine can probably help you find the very article you want.
Choose a few key words from the item you're looking for and click here to go to the search engine.
(Searching on whole phrases will often fail to produce matches because the text of many items is quite variable, so picking out one or two key words is the best strategy.)
We do reserve the right to use non-confidential material sent to us via this form on our site, but only after it has been stripped of any information that might identify the sender or any other individuals not party to this communication.