|
Claim: Photograph shows an unusual animal carcass found on a beach in Montauk,
Example: [Collected via e-mail, July 2008]
Origins: The so-called "Montauk Monster" is a carcass that was supposedly found and photographed by three women on For example, Newsday reported the opinion of William Wise, director of Stony Brook University's Living Marine Resources Institute:
William Wise,
Others asserted that the creature was in fact a raccoon, however:
He knows what it isn't. A raccoon. ("The legs appear to be too long in proportion to the body.") A sea turtle. ("Sea turtles do not have teeth.") A rodent. ("Rodents have two huge, curved incisor teeth in front of their mouths.") He said the general body shape looks like a dog or other canine ("Coyote?"). But that the "prominent eye ridge and the feet" don't match. He said the feet and face look "somewhat ovine" Wise's best, educated guess: "A talented someone who got very creative with latex." But Wise also offered what he called a next-best guess: "A dog or coyote that was diseased and has been in the sea for a while."
[Montauk local Noel Arikian said,] "In photos there appeared to be a beak. It was just a tricky angle. It's a dead raccoon. That's what it is. It's undoubtedly a raccoon, the same teeth, paws, the right size."
For now, the Montauk Monster is reportedly rotting in the backyard of a local resident who remains unidentified by the creature's finders.
Larry Penny, East Hampton's director of natural resources, agreed and added that when raccoons get old they wander off to marshes to die. High tide might have floated one out of a marsh and into the sea." "No other animal has a body like that," Last updated: 31 July 2008 Urban Legends Reference Pages © 1995-2008 by snopes.com. This material may not be reproduced without permission. snopes and the snopes.com logo are registered service marks of snopes.com. Sources:
|
|








Sources: