Claim: An attempted abduction of a child from a mall or amusement park was thwarted because the kidnappers forgot to change the child's shoes.
[Collected via Facebook, May 2015]
[Click here for additional examples.].
[Click here for additional examples.].
Origins: One of the most effective types of scarelore is the "barely escaped from the clutches of evil" variety — nothing drives home a warning better than a vivid first-person account of a narrowly-averted tragedy. The explicit warning presented in this legend is obvious: You must never, ever let your child out of your sight in a public place, even for a moment — kidnappers could be lurking anywhere, and the abduction in this example was foiled only due to the diligence of an employee (and the thoroughness of a store's security precautions).
Although this warning is undeniably good advice, the legend that presents it exaggerates both the prevalence and manner of kidnappings. A child is far more likely to be snatched by a family member or
This type of tale that has been circulating for decades, always involving the kidnapping of children from family-type public places such as amusement parks and shopping centers. A kidnapper snatches a child away from an inattentive parent, drugs it, and hustles it into a restroom; there the abductor performs a quick haircut, dye job, and clothing change on the child to conceal its identity (and sometimes to obscure its gender) and wraps it in blankets before attempting to quickly and quietly spirit the child off the premises. Meanwhile, a vigilant security force has sealed off all the exits, and the attempted kidnapping is thwarted either because the kidnapper realizes he cannot escape undetected and simply abandons his intended victim in the bathroom, or because the child's parent is monitoring the exits (in person or via security cameras) and recognizes the youngster by its distinctive shoes, which the kidnapper has neglected to change or remove.
More malevolent versions of this story end not with the thwarting of the abduction attempt, but with the discovery of the child's original clothing on a restroom floor (along with other evidence of what had transpired, such as loose hair, scissors, and a bottle of hair dye). In these versions police tell the victims' parents they are powerless to recover their children (whom they warn are probably already on their way out of the country to be used as unwilling organ donors or sex slaves), and the parents are paid off to keep quiet about the abductions. Often the payoff for the parents' silence is claimed to be something absurdly small in value, such as free passes to the amusement park where the kidnapping took place, yet people continue to take the story at face value. (Would you keep quiet about your child's disappearance for any amount of money, much less something as paltry as a few free tickets?)
The tale of the "haircut-and-dye-job" kidnappers goes back several decades and is tied to the growth of cities, the movement away from rural areas and small towns, and the increase in the crime rate that occurred in America after World
Over the years, this story has been set in virtually every type of locale where families mingle with large numbers of strangers, such as shopping malls, beaches, carnivals, fairs, and amusement parks. Since the details of urban legends tend to gravitate towards the most prominent examples of their kind, this legend has become more and more associated with places such as Disney theme parks and Walmart stores, both examples of well-known large facilities frequented by families with children, and both part of huge corporate enterprises. (In truth, no child has ever been kidnapped from a Disney theme park, and although the abduction and murder of 6-year-old Adam Walsh led Walmart to create its Code Adam protocol for locating missing children in their stores, Adam Walsh actually disappeared from a Sears outlet, and no evidence was found to indicate the abductor had made an effort to alter Adam's appearance.)
Sightings: An episode of NBC's Law & Order: SVU ("Stolen"; original air date
- Sometimes the intended victim is found abandoned in a bathroom, partially disguised (hair cut, clothing changed), or implements for altering the child's appearance (scissors, razor, hair dye, wig, clothing) are found in a bathroom stall.
- Sometimes the kidnapper is caught attempting to escape through an exit with the disguised victim (often because the parent recognizes some detail of the child's clothing the kidnapper has neglected to alter, such as shoes).
- The child is often found to have been drugged (to make it easier for the kidnapper to alter the child's appearance and smuggle him out an exit).
| Kidnappings and Missing Persons |
Brunvand, Jan Harold. The Vanishing Hitchhiker. New York: W. W. Norton, 1981. ISBN 0-393-95169-3 (pp. 182-184). Coogan, Naoise. "Abduction Rumours Refuted by Shopping Centre Management." Kilkenny Advertiser. 13 January 2012. de Vos, Gail. Tales, Rumors and Gossip. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited, 1996. ISBN 1-56308-190-3 (pp. 233-234). Kahn, Gabe. "Channel 10 Runs 'Disney World Abduction' Hoax." Arutz Sheva 7 [Israel]. 30 April 2012. Koenig, David. Mouse Tales: A Behind-the-Ears Look at Disneyland. Irvine, CA: Bonaventure Press, 1994. ISBN 0-9640605-5-8 (pp.162-164). Miller, Martin. "Disney's Lost and Found." Los Angeles Times. 12 June 1994 (p. 3). Trewyn, Hywel. "North Wales Abduction Story ‘Just an Urban Myth'." Daily Post [North Wales]. 28 July 2008. Leinster Express. "No Truth' in Abduction Rumours." 29 June 2010. Shropshire Star. "Store Child Abduction Is Denied." 10 June 2008. This Is Plymouth. "Shopping Centre Hits Out at Urban Legend." 2 June 2009. The Big Book of Urban Legends. New York: Paradox Press, 1994. ISBN 1-56389-165-4 (p. 166).