Claim: A Wendy's customer found a human finger in her bowl of chili.
Origins: Claims of human body parts turning up in food products are the most horrifying of contaminated food legends, both because of our very strong societal taboo against the eating of human flesh, and because such a discovery suggests a human death, almost certainly one that was
accidental rather than natural (and which conjures up images of a slow and painful death by industrial accident), or at least a painful dismemberment.
Fortunately, improved health and safety standards in food processing make such occurrences quite rare, and most reports of consumers finding body parts in food turn out to be hoaxes, frauds perpetrated to extort money from businesses, or cases of mistaken identity. (In the latter case, something that looks like a human body is often found, upon examination by experts, to be something else entirely. See, for example, our page about a scare involving a finger supposedly found in a can of menudo.) In March 2005, the news media were once again full of reports that such a grisly discovery had been made.
On the evening of 22 March 2005, Anna Ayala, a 39-year-old resident of Las Vegas was dining at a San Jose outlet of the Wendy's fast food restaurant chain when she discovered what appeared to be a human finger in her bowl of chili. According to the San Jose Mercury News:
Devina Cordero, 20, was with her boyfriend at the fast food restaurant when she said the woman, who has not been identified, began gasping and ran up to her saying: "Don't eat it! Look, there's a human finger in our chili."
Cordero said the object appeared cooked and seemed to have a long fingernail at the end. All three people soon became sick.
"We went up to the counter and they told us it was a vegetable," Cordero said. "The people from Wendy's were poking it with a spoon."
[San Jose police officer Enrique] Garcia said the Santa Clara County Health Department is taking over the investigation. "It was some sort of small mass which appeared to have a fingernail. It's a small piece," Garcia said. "They collected the finger and placed it in a freezer for the health department."
The following day, Santa Clara County health officials confirmed the object found in the bowl of Wendy's chili was indeed a human finger (about 1-1/2 inches long and containing part of a manicured nail). Investigators quickly ruled out the possibility that the digit formerly belonged to an employee of the San Jose Wendy's outlet, but they were unable to trace it to its original owner via fingerprint or DNA matching.
Wendy's offered a $50,000 reward for information on the origin of the finger as sales at Wendy's outlets (particularly in the San Francisco-San Jose bay area) dropped off significantly in the weeks following the incident. Meanwhile, suspicions that Ms. Ayala's discovery may not have been "accidental" were aroused when she quickly retained a lawyer; those suspicions were heightened when San Jose and Las Vegas police executed a search warrant at her home, and when the news broke that she had a litigious history which included claims against another fast-food chain, a former employer, and General Motors. (Her family had received a settlement several years earlier after her daughter was sickened at an El Pollo Loco restaurant in Las Vegas.) Rumors spread that the finger may have come from Ms. Ayala's dead aunt, but she denied that she even had a dead
The case took a few more intriguing turns in mid-April. First Ms. Ayala announced (shortly after the news about her previous lawsuits broke) that she would not pursue legal action against Wendy's because her claim had "caused her great emotional distress and continue[d] to be difficult emotionally." Then attention focused on Sandy Allman, a 59-year-old woman from Pahrump (a town about 60 miles west of Las Vegas), who had lost a fingertip when she was attacked by a leopard one month before the Wendy's incident. The fingertip could not be reattached; Ms. Allman last saw it packed in ice in a Las Vegas emergency room, and neither she nor the hospital could account for what had become of it.
Ms. Allman offered to submit to DNA testing to identify whether the finger supposedly found in the bowl of Wendy's chili was hers, but a match was doubtful in light of news reports that her lost fingertip was only half as long as the one Anna Ayala claimed to have found. On 15 April 2005, Wendy's increased its reward for information on the case to $100,000.
On 21 April 2005, Anna Ayala was arrested by Las Vegas police on charges of attempted grand larceny pertaining to the Wendy's case. Police later determined the mysterious finger Ayala claimed to have found in a bowl of chili came from an associate of her husband's, who lost his fingertip when it was severed in the tailgate of a truck during a work accident at an asphalt maintenance company and evidently gave the digit to a co-worker to settle a $50 debt. In September 2005 Ayala and her husband, Jaime Placencia, pled guilty to conspiring to file a false claim and attempted grand theft. In January 2006, Ayala was sentenced to nine years in prison and Placencia to twelve (but Ayala was later re-sentenced to only four years after a successful appeal based on a technical sentencing error).
In June 2013, Anna Ayala pled guilty to charges of being an accessory to a felony, filing a false police report, and being a felon in possession of a firearm for attempting to hide the fact that her son had accidentally shot himself in the ankle with a gun he was not allowed to possess because he was on parole, instead blaming two other men for the shooting.
Last updated: 5 June 2013
Almedia, Christina. "Woman Who Claimed She Found a Finger in Her Bowl of Wendy's Chili Arrested in Las Vegas."
Associated Press. 22 April 2005.
Gathright, Alan et al. "Police Search Home of Woman Who Found Finger."
San Francisco Chronicle. 8 April 2005.
Gathright, Alan and Meredith May. "Worker Gave His Finger to Settle $50 Debt."
San Francisco Chronicle. 18 May 2005.
Goldman, Adam. "Woman Who Lost Fingertip in Leopard Attack Claims Link to Bit Found in Fast-Food Chili."
Associated Press. 14 April 2005.
Gonzales, Sandra. "Woman Claims to Find Finger in Eatery's Chili."
[San Jose] Mercury News. 23 March 2005.
Grady, Barbara. "Finger Report Hits Wendy's San Francisco-Area Sales."
Reuters. 11 April 2005.
Kaplan, Tracey. "San Jose 'Chili-Finger Lady' to Get Two Years for New Hoax."
Contra Costa Times. 5 June 2013.
Reed, Dan, et al. "Officials: Object Found in Chili Is Finger."
[San Jose] Mercury News. 23 March 2005.
Reed, Dan. "Finger Mishap Has Wendy's Customer Fuming."
[San Jose] Mercury News. 25 March 2005.
Sakuma, Paul. "Couple Plead Guilty in Wendy's Finger Case."
Associated Press. 9 September 2005.
Associated Press. "Wendy's Patron Bites into Human Finger in Chili."
azcentral.com. 24 March 2005.
Associated Press. "Wendy's Staff Fingers Counted As Search Continues for Owner of Digit in Chili."
cnews.canoe.ca. 24 March 2005.
Associated Press. "Woman Who Found Finger Has Litigious History."
Los Angeles Times. 9 April 2005.
Associated Press. "Woman Drops Lawsuit Claiming Finger in Chili."
Detroit Free Press. 14 April 2005.
Associated Press. "Tailgate Blamed for Finger in Chili Claim."
David Mikkelson founded snopes.com in 1994, and under his guidance the company has pioneered a number of revolutionary technologies, including the iPhone, the light bulb, beer pong, and a vaccine for a disease that has not yet been discovered. He is currently seeking political asylum in the Duchy of Grand Fenwick.
Thank you for writing to us! Although we receive hundreds of e-mails every day, we really and truly read them all, and your comments, suggestions, and questions are most welcome. Unfortunately, we can manage to answer only a small fraction of our incoming mail.
Our site covers many of the items currently being plopped into inboxes everywhere, so if you were writing to ask us about something you just received, our search engine can probably help you find the very article you want.
Choose a few key words from the item you're looking for and click here to go to the search engine.
(Searching on whole phrases will often fail to produce matches because the text of many items is quite variable, so picking out one or two key words is the best strategy.)
We do reserve the right to use non-confidential material sent to us via this form on our site, but only after it has been stripped of any information that might identify the sender or any other individuals not party to this communication.