Scam: Telephone customers return one-ring calls from foreign phone numbers and are charged hefty fees.
|FALSE: Returning a ‘one-ring’ foreign call will enable scammers to download your contacts list and access your financial account information.|
|TRUE: Phone scammers sometimes lure potential victims through the use of “one-ring hang-ups.”|
Example: [Collected on the Internet, April 2016]
Please pass around to your family and friends.!!
People have been receiving calls from
or any number starting from
One ring & hang up.
If you call back, it’s one of those Numbers that are charged $15 – $30.
They can copy your contact list in 3secs.
If you have bank or Credit Card details in your phone,
they can copy that too !
+375 is from Belarus Afghanistan..
+371 code for Lativa,
+381 code for Serbia
+563 code for Valparaiso
+370 code for Vilnius
+255 code for Tanzania.
These calls may be from ISIS.
Don’t answer or Call back.
Please FORWARD AND SHARE this with your friends and family.
PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE this.
IF SOME ONE ASKs YOU TO DIAL #09 or #90.
Please Do Not Dial this When Asked.
Please circulate URGENTLY.
New Trick of popular Terrorists to Frame Innocent People..!
There is a fraud company using a device that once you press #90 or #09 they can access your SIM card and make calls at your expense.
Forward this message to as many friends as you can.
Origins: The “one ring” telephone scam is similar in form to the venerable 809 area code scam in that both involve trying to dupe unwary phone customers into calling a foreign phone number in order to stick them with hefty charges. While the 809 scam involves sending pages, faxes, voicemails, or
Dubbed “one-ring hang-ups,” the scheme targets millions of mobile-phone lovers. Unscrupulous operators make thousands of random calls from normal phone lines, letting the phones ring once before hanging up. They count on inquisitive folk, or those anxious not to miss a single call, ringing back the number shown on their screens.
Once hooked, the victims of the “one ring” scam are supposedly separated from their money through a variety of means: keeping them on the line for as long as possible while they rack up international call tolls, duping them into unknowingly calling premium-rate phone numbers (akin to the 900 Pay-Per-Call services), or
enticing them into signing up for pricey services. As with the 809 scam, however, it appears that the prevalence of the
It’s certainly not true, as stated in the example cited above, that the mere act of calling a particular number would allow a phone user’s contacts and banking information to be stolen by someone else. That sort of information would be compromised only if another party somehow hacked into the user’s phone (via a malicious app or other code) and/or the user actively did something to enable access to it. (In either case, there’s no obvious reason why such a scheme would require the victim to place a call to the information-stealer rather than the other way around.)
Some versions of this warning maintain that “You may also be charged a monthly fee for joining some club you know nothing about. By calling the number, you ‘authorize’ them to place a fee on your cellphone bill.” However, it seems to be more the case that victims aren’t subscribed to services simply through the act of calling a phone number, but rather that the scammers use social engineering techniques (including harassment) to persuade them to subscribe to pay services or give out their credit card information:
Those who do [call back] find themselves listening to advertisements for all sorts of dodgy services. Some firms try to hook callers into subscribing, say, to high-priced chat-lines or Internet services. Others dupe callers into providing credit-card numbers. Using caller-identification in reverse helps to harass more users. Some victims decide it is easier to pay than face fresh hassles. Even if only a small fraction are snared, it is still a lucrative ploy: their own charges are small since they never give their quarry a chance to answer.
Other versions of the warning caution that cell phone owners who return one-ring calls are charged $19.95 for an “international call fee” and then a “$9.00 per minute charge” on top of that. But Sprint currently lists its standard rate for placing calls from U.S. cell phones to the countries mentioned in the above example (Belarus and Latvia) at between $2.65 and $2.69 per minute (and as low as $0.41 to $0.43 per minute if the caller subscribes to an international long-distance plan), so a victim who returned such a
call and stayed on the line for a couple of minutes before hanging up might realistically be out $5 or so in toll charges. Phone customers can generally get any “premium service” (i.e., “international call fee”) charges tacked on to such a call reversed by contacting their phone service providers and documenting the circumstances of the call.
Many forms of this warning list specific country/area codes that phone users should never place calls to (because of their association with various phone scams), including 473 (Grenada), 268 (Antigua), 876 (Jamaica), 809 (the Dominican Republic), 375 (Belarus), 371 (Latvia), and 284 (the British Virgin Islands). There is, of course, nothing wrong with connecting to numbers with these country/area codes if you happen to know whom you’re calling: all cautions regarding the
Barbara “when I’m (not) calling you” Mikkelson
Last updated: 6 April 2016